Consent vs Legitimate Interest Under GDPR: Making the Right Choice for Data Processing

When it comes to processing personal data, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) doesn’t leave much room for ambiguity. Article 6 of the GDPR outlines six lawful bases for processing personal data, and among these, consent and legitimate interest are two of the most frequently used, but also the most misunderstood.

Understanding when to rely on each can mean the difference between compliance and costly regulatory fallout.

Why Your Legal Basis Matters

Selecting the correct legal basis isn’t just a bureaucratic checkbox, it’s a foundational requirement for GDPR compliance. The basis you choose determines how you communicate with users, how you manage data rights, and how regulators will evaluate your practices.

Failing to choose (and document) the correct basis can invalidate your entire data processing activity, potentially exposing you to penalties or reputational harm.

Consent: When Users Take the Lead

Consent is one of the most transparent and user-centric legal bases. Under Article 6(1)(a) of the GDPR, valid consent means the user has given explicit, informed permission for the processing of their personal data for clearly defined purposes.

To meet GDPR standards, consent must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous. That means no pre-ticked boxes, no vague language, and no passive agreement. Users must take a clear affirmative action like ticking a checkbox or clicking “I agree.”

Consent must also be reversible. This means organizations are obligated to offer an easy, accessible mechanism for users to withdraw their consent at any time, with no negative consequences for doing so.

This legal basis is especially relevant when processing sensitive personal data, running targeted marketing campaigns, or carrying out any operation that significantly affects individual privacy. In these cases, it’s not only safer, but often expected that users are given full control over their data.

Legitimate Interest: Practical but Requires Justification

Legitimate interest is a more flexible legal basis that allows organizations to process personal data without asking for explicit consent, provided that the processing is necessary, the purpose is legitimate, and it does not override the individual’s rights.

This basis is defined under Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR and is especially suited to low-risk, business-essential activities such as fraud detection, internal analytics, or maintaining a secure IT environment.

However, using legitimate interest demands accountability. Before relying on it, you must conduct a Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA). This involves:

Purpose Test: Determining whether the purpose qualifies as a legitimate interest.

Necessity Test: Assessing whether the data processing is necessary for that purpose.

Balancing Test: Evaluating whether the individual’s rights and freedoms outweigh your interest.

The balancing act here is key. If your activity could surprise users or intrude on their privacy in unexpected ways, legitimate interest may not hold up, especially under regulatory scrutiny.

How to Decide Between Consent and Legitimate Interest

Making the right choice starts with asking the right questions. Consider whether your users would reasonably expect their data to be processed for your stated purpose. Ask yourself how much control and transparency the situation calls for.

If the processing involves sensitive data, personal profiling, or decisions that significantly affect individuals, then consent is the stronger, more defensible option.

On the other hand, if your purpose is aligned with core business operations, doesn’t pose significant privacy risks, and is something users would naturally expect, such as system security monitoring or basic website analytics, then legitimate interest may be appropriate.

Each scenario demands a risk-based, context-aware approach. What works in one context may be inappropriate in another.

Compliance Isn’t a Checkbox, It’s a Commitment

While it may be tempting to use legitimate interest to avoid frequent consent prompts or reduce operational burden, doing so without a strong justification can backfire. Regulators are increasingly scrutinizing LIA processes and will challenge their validity if they appear weak or one-sided.

Consent, though it requires more setup and ongoing management, generally offers a safer path where transparency and user trust are crucial. It aligns more closely with GDPR’s emphasis on fairness and user control.

Ultimately, whichever basis you choose, it must be properly documented, reviewed periodically, and explained clearly in your privacy notices.

Final Thoughts: Building Trust Through the Right Legal Basis

Your legal basis isn’t just a compliance checkbox, it’s a reflection of your organization’s approach to data ethics. Whether you choose consent or legitimate interest, your decision should prioritize fairness, transparency, and accountability.

By aligning your data practices with the principles of the GDPR, you don’t just stay compliant, you earn the trust of your users and build a stronger foundation for responsible data governance.

‍